<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Ouch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intrepidgirlbot.com/2010/01/13/big-ouch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intrepidgirlbot.com/2010/01/13/big-ouch/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 05:55:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Willem</title>
		<link>http://www.intrepidgirlbot.com/2010/01/13/big-ouch/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Willem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diananock.com/?p=432#comment-952</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s a note-worthy &quot;fun fact&quot; that raccoons are related to bears, since they&#039;re only related by Order (i.e. they&#039;re both carnivores). So they&#039;re pretty much equally related to bears as they are to dogs and walruses.

They were once thought to be part of the bear Family, but it turned out they&#039;re not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s a note-worthy &#8220;fun fact&#8221; that raccoons are related to bears, since they&#8217;re only related by Order (i.e. they&#8217;re both carnivores). So they&#8217;re pretty much equally related to bears as they are to dogs and walruses.</p>
<p>They were once thought to be part of the bear Family, but it turned out they&#8217;re not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

